Thomas M. Walsh, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 220 F.2d 488 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
- 220 F.2d 488 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
Argued March 2, 1955. Decided March 10, 1955
[95 U.S.App.D.C. 124] Mr. James T. Barbour, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. George E. Hamilton III, Asst. U.S. Atty. with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN, and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The question is whether a forfeited recognizance is a judgment within the meaning of D.C.Code 1951, § 15-101, 31 Stat. 1381. We agree with the District Court that it is not. Cf. D.C.Code 1951, § 15-103, 31 Stat. 1381.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
