Richard H. Davis, Appellant, v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, United States Post Office Department, Appellee, 219 F.2d 510 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
Annotate this CaseDecided February 17, 1955
Mr. Richard H. Davis, appellant, pro se.
Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll and Joseph A. Rafferty, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, submitted on the brief for appellee. Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellee.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Richard H. Davis, was dismissed by the Post Office Department in 1935 pursuant to charges preferred against him. In his suit for re-instatement, filed May 3, 1954, the District Court correctly granted summary judgment to the Postmaster General because of the appellant's laches.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
