Hamilton et al. v. Polk, 211 F.2d 51 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
Annotate this CaseDecided March 11, 1954
Messrs. Warren E. Magee and Paul J. Sedgwick, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. R. Logan Hollowell and Vaden S. Pitts, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Joseph D. Bulman, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Sidney M. Goldstein and Curtis P. Mitchell, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek reversal of a judgment entered against them in a personal injury suit. We find no merit either in their main contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motions to set aside the jury's verdict and to grant a new trial on the grounds of fraud and newly discovered evidence, or in the other contentions urged for reversal.
The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
