Marie E. Barwick, Petitioner v. Hinda S. Manheim, Respondent, 189 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1951)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 189 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1951) Argued May 24, 1951
Decided June 7, 1951

On Petition for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis.

Jo V. Morgan, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

James M. Desmond, Washington, D. C., with whom Roy B. Kelly, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent.

Before EDGERTON and BAZELON, Circuit Judges, and ARTHUR F. LEDERLE, District Judge sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.


The petition for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied. Wells v. United States, 318 U.S. 257, 63 S. Ct. 582, 87 L. Ed. 746; Newman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 419, 184 F.2d 275.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.