Payne v. Capital Transit Co, 181 F.2d 613 (D.C. Cir. 1950)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 181 F.2d 613 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Argued January 4, 1950
Decided February 13, 1950

Mr. Wesley E. McDonald, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Howard Boyd, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Paul R. Connolly, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, PROCTOR and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


This appeal from the District Court in a suit for slander raises a question as to the court's action in directing a verdict for defendant (appellee) upon the ground that the alleged defamatory utterance was made under the protection of qualified privilege.

In our opinion the record clearly supports the ruling of the trial court.

We also think the court acted well within its discretion in refusing to delay the trial to await the appearance of a proposed witness for the plaintiff (appellant), especially so, when, in acting upon the motion for a directed verdict, the judge considered a proffer by counsel of expected testimony from such witness. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.