2005 Washington Revised Code RCW 5.40.050: Breach of duty — Evidence of negligence — Negligence per se.
A breach of a duty imposed by statute, ordinance, or administrative rule shall not be considered negligence per se, but may be considered by the trier of fact as evidence of negligence; however, any breach of duty as provided by statute, ordinance, or administrative rule relating to electrical fire safety, the use of smoke alarms, sterilization of needles and instruments used in tattooing or electrology as required under RCW 70.54.350, or driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, shall be considered negligence per se.
[2001 c 194 § 5; 1986 c 305 § 901.]
| Preamble -- Report to legislature -- Applicability -- Severability -- 1986 c 305: See notes following RCW
4.16.160.
|
Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Washington may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.