Download as PDF
304.39-060 Acceptance or rejection of partial abolition of tort liability -Exceptions.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Any person who registers, operates, maintains or uses a motor vehicle on the
public roadways of this Commonwealth shall, as a condition of such
registration, operation, maintenance or use of such motor vehicle and use of
the public roadways, be deemed to have accepted the provisions of this
subtitle, and in particular those provisions which are contained in this section.
(a) Tort liability with respect to accidents occurring in this Commonwealth
and arising from the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle is
"abolished" for damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease to
the extent the basic reparation benefits provided in this subtitle are
payable therefor, or that would be payable but for any deductible
authorized by this subtitle, under any insurance policy or other method of
security complying with the requirements of this subtitle, except to the
extent noneconomic detriment qualifies under paragraph (b) of this
subsection.
(b) In any action of tort brought against the owner, registrant, operator or
occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been
provided as required in this subtitle, or against any person or organization
legally responsible for his or her acts or omissions, a plaintiff may recover
damages in tort for pain, suffering, mental anguish and inconvenience
because of bodily injury, sickness or disease arising out of the ownership,
maintenance, operation or use of such motor vehicle only in the event that
the benefits which are payable for such injury as "medical expense" or
which would be payable but for any exclusion or deductible authorized by
this subtitle exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), or the injury or disease
consists in whole or in part of permanent disfigurement, a fracture to a
bone, a compound, comminuted, displaced or compressed fracture, loss
of a body member, permanent injury within reasonable medical
probability, permanent loss of bodily function or death. Any person who is
entitled to receive free medical and surgical benefits shall be deemed in
compliance with the requirements of this subsection upon a showing that
the medical treatment received has an equivalent value of at least one
thousand dollars ($1,000).
(c) Tort liability is not so limited for injury to a person who is not an owner,
operator, maintainer or user of a motor vehicle within subsection (1) of
this section, nor for injury to the passenger of a motorcycle arising out of
the maintenance or use of such motorcycle.
For purposes of this section and the provisions on reparation obligor's rights of
reimbursement, subrogation, and indemnity, a person does not intentionally
cause harm merely because his or her act or failure to act is intentional or done
with the realization that it creates a grave risk of harm.
Any person may refuse to consent to the limitations of his or her tort rights and
liabilities as contained in this section. Such rejection must be completed in
writing or electronically in a form to be prescribed by the Department of
Insurance and must have been executed and filed with the department at a
time prior to any motor vehicle accident for which such rejection is to apply.
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Such rejection form shall affirmatively state in bold print that acceptance of this
form of insurance denies the applicant the right to sue a negligent motorist
unless certain requirements contained in the policy of insurance are met.
Rejection by a person who is under legal disability shall be made on behalf of
such person by his or her legal guardian, conservator, or natural parent. The
failure of such guardian or a natural parent of a person under legal disability to
file a rejection, within six (6) months from the date that this subtitle would
otherwise become applicable to such person, shall be deemed to be an
affirmative acceptance of all provisions of this subtitle. Provided, however, any
person who, at the time of an accident, does not have basic reparation
insurance but has not formally rejected such limitations of his or her tort rights
and liabilities and has at such time in effect security equivalent to that required
by KRS 304.39-110 shall be deemed to have fully rejected such limitations
within meaning of this section for that accident only.
(a) Any rejection must be filed with the Department of Insurance and shall
become effective on the date of its filing until revoked. Nothing in this
section shall require a new rejection to be filed for each new motor vehicle
policy issued;
(b) Any rejection filed prior to June 30, 1980, shall be deemed to be effective
from the date of its filing until revoked; and
(c) Any revocation shall be in writing and shall become effective upon the
date of its filing with the Department of Insurance.
Every insurance company when issuing an automobile policy to a resident of
this Commonwealth must inform the buyer in writing in a form to be prescribed
by the insurance commissioner of his or her right to reject the limitations of the
tort rights and liabilities under this subtitle in the manner provided in
subsections (4) and (7) of this section.
Any rejection shall result in the full retention by the individual of his or her tort
rights and tort liabilities. Any person injured by a motor vehicle operator who
has such rejection on file may claim the full damages, including nonpecuniary
damages, or, if such injured person has not rejected his or her own tort
limitations, he or she may also claim basic reparation benefits from the
appropriate security on the vehicle as established under KRS 304.39-050. If
such provider of security is other than the one providing security for the
operator who has rejected the limitations, such provider shall be subrogated to
the rights of the injured person to the extent of reparation benefits paid against
the owner and operator of the vehicle.
No person who has rejected the tort limitations under this section, except as
provided in subsection (9) of this section or KRS 304.39-140(5), may collect
basic reparation benefits.
Any owner or operator of a motorcycle, as defined in Kentucky Revised
Statutes, may file a rejection as described in subsections (4) and (5) of this
section, which will apply solely to the ownership and operation of a motorcycle
but will not apply to injury resulting from the ownership, operation or use of any
other type of motor vehicle.
Effective:July 15, 2010
History: Amended 2010 Ky. Acts ch. 24, sec. 1525, effective July 15, 2010; and
ch. 166, sec. 11, effective July 15, 2010. -- Amended 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 37,
sec. 1, effective July 15, 1986. -- Amended 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 364, sec. 1,
effective July 15, 1980. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 75, sec. 2, effective
March 29, 1976. -- Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 385, sec. 6, effective July 1, 1975.
Note:
1980 Ky. Acts ch. 396, sec. 92 would have amended this section effective
July 1, 1982. However, 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 396 was repealed by 1982 Ky. Acts
ch. 141, sec. 146, also effective July 1,1982.
Legislative Research Commission Note (7/15/2010). This section was amended
by 2010 Ky. Acts chs. 24 and 166, which do not appear to be in conflict and
have been codified together.
Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Kentucky may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.