There is a newer version of this Article

View our newest version here

2020 Colorado Revised Statutes
Title 15 - Probate, Trusts, And Fiduciaries
Article 14. Persons Under Disability - Protection

Previous Next

Editor's note: (1) Articles 10 to 17 of this title were repealed and reenacted in 1973, and parts 1 to 4 of this article were subsequently repealed and reenacted in 2000, resulting in the addition, relocation, and elimination of sections as well as subject matter. For amendments to parts 1 to 4 of this article prior to 2000, consult the Colorado statutory research explanatory note and the table itemizing the replacement volumes and supplements to the original volume of C.R.S. 1973 beginning on page vii in the front of this volume and the editor's note immediately preceding article 10 of this title. Former C.R.S. section numbers prior to 2000 are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated.

(2) Section 15-17-103, as enacted by House Bill 01-1377, modified the applicability of parts 1 to 4. (See L. 2001, p. 889.)

PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Editor's note: Section 15-17-103 provides that parts 1 to 4 of this article, as repealed and reenacted effective January 1, 2001, apply to any and all estates, trusts, or protective proceedings whether created or filed prior to or on or after January 1, 2001.

Law reviews: For article, "Adult Guardianships and Conservatorships: Protection of Constitutional Rights", see 15 Colo. Law. 820 (1986); for article, "Mental Competence and Legal Capacity Under Colorado Law: A Question of Consistency", see 19 Colo. Law. 1813 (1990); for article, "Protecting a Disabled Client in a Dissolution of Marriage Action", see 24 Colo. Law. 795 (1995); for article, "Highlights of Colorado's New Guardianship and Conservatorship Laws", see 30 Colo. Law. 5 (Jan. 2001); for article, "Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation Settlements for Incapacitated Persons: Part I", see 30 Colo. Law. 43 (Jan. 2001); for article, "Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation Settlements for Incapacitated Persons: Part II", see 30 Colo. Law. 56 (Feb. 2001); for article, "Examination of Selected Provisions of Colorado's Uniform Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Act", see 31 Colo. Law. 71 (Sept. 2002); for article, "Crisis Intervention to Prevent Elder Abuse: Emergency Guardianships and Other Legal Procedures" see 33 Colo. Law. 91 (July 2004); for article, "The Basics on Juveniles in Probate Court for Protective Proceedings", see 36 Colo. Law. 15 (Feb. 2007); for article, "Practical Solutions to Elder Financial Abuse and Fiduciary Theft", see 41 Colo. Law. 61 (Dec. 2012).

PART 2 GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR

Law reviews: For article, "Age Requirements in Colorado: A Guide for Estate Planners", see 34 Colo. Law. 87 (Aug. 2005); for article, "The Basics on Juveniles in Probate Court for Protective Proceedings", see 36 Colo. Law. 15 (Feb. 2007); for article, "Multi-State Issues When Appointing Guardians for Minors", see 43 Colo. Law. 65 (Nov. 2014); for article, "State Court Orders Supporting Special Immigrant Juvenile Status", see 45 Colo. Law. 45 (June 2016).

PART 3 GUARDIANSHIP OF INCAPACITATED PERSON

Law reviews: For article, "Ethical Obligations of Petitioners' Counsel in Guardianship and Conservator Cases", see 24 Colo. Law. 2565; for article, "Highlights of Colorado's New Guardianship and Conservatorship Laws", see 30 Colo. Law. 5 (Jan. 2001); for article, "Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation Settlements for Incapacitated Persons: Part I", see 30 Colo. Law. 43 (Jan. 2001); for article, "Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation Settlements for Incapacitated Persons: Part II", see 30 Colo. Law. 56 (Feb. 2001); for article, "Placement on a Secure Unit by Surrogate Decision-Makers", see 34 Colo. Law. 49 (Oct. 2005); for article, "Colorado Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services and Least-Restrictive Environment", see 39 Colo. Law. 35 (May 2010); for article, "Practical Solutions to Elder Financial Abuse and Fiduciary Theft", see 41 Colo. Law. 61 (Dec. 2012).

PART 4 PROTECTION OF PROPERTY OF PROTECTED PERSON

Law reviews: For article, "Statutory Custodianship Trusts", see 13 Colo. Law. 786 (1984); for article, "The Revocable Living Trust Revisited", see 18 Colo. Law. 225 (1989); for article, "Trust Protection of Personal Injury Recoveries from Public Creditors", see 19 Colo. Law. 2187 (1990); for article, "Personal Injury Settlements With Minors", see 21 Colo. Law. 1167 (1992); for article, "Avoiding Living Probate", see 27 Colo. Law. 5 (March 1998); for article, "Highlights of Colorado's New Guardianship and Conservatorship Laws", see 30 Colo. Law. 5 (Jan. 2001); for article, "Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation Settlements for Incapacitated Persons: Part I", see 30 Colo. Law. 43 (Jan. 2001); for article, "Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation Settlements for Incapacitated Persons: Part II", see 30 Colo. Law. 56 (Feb. 2001); for article, "Estate Planning Considerations when Distributing Assets from a Conservatorship Estate", see 32 Colo. Law. 55 (Aug. 2003); for article, "The Basics on Juveniles in Probate Court for Protective Proceedings", see 36 Colo. Law. 15 (Feb. 2007); for article, "Practical Solutions to Elder Financial Abuse and Fiduciary Theft", see 41 Colo. Law. 61 (Dec. 2012).

PART 5 POWERS OF ATTORNEY

Cross references: For provisions relating to anatomical gifts and their effect on advance health-care directives, see part 2 of article 19 of this title; for provisions relating to a medical durable power of attorney, see § 15-14-506; for provisions relating to declarations concerning medical treatment, see article 18 of this title; for provisions relating to proxy decision-makers for medical treatment decisions, see article 18.5 of this title; for provisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation directives, see article 18.6 of this title.

PART 6 POWER OF ATTORNEY

Cross references: For provisions for a power of attorney granted by an individual, see the "Uniform Power of Attorney Act", part 7 of this article.

Law reviews: For article, "The Durable Power of Attorney: Defining the Agent's Duties", see 41 Colo. Law. 49 (May 2012).

PART 7 UNIFORM POWER OF ATTORNEY ACT

Cross references: For provisions for a power of attorney executed by an entity, see part 6 of this article.

Law reviews: For article, "The Durable Power of Attorney: Defining the Agent's Duties", see 41 Colo. Law. 49 (May 2012).

PREFATORY NOTE

The catalyst for the Uniform Power of Attorney Act (the "Act") was a national review of state power of attorney legislation. The review revealed growing divergence among states' statutory treatment of powers of attorney. The original Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act ("Original Act"), last amended in 1987, was at one time followed by all but a few jurisdictions. Despite initial uniformity, the review found that a majority of states had enacted non-uniform provisions to deal with specific matters upon which the Original Act is silent. The topics about which there was increasing divergence included: 1) the authority of multiple agents; 2) the authority of a later-appointed fiduciary or guardian; 3) the impact of dissolution or annulment of the principal's marriage to the agent; 4) activation of contingent powers; 5) the authority to make gifts; and 6) standards for agent conduct and liability. Other topics about which states had legislated, although notnecessarily in a divergent manner, included: successor agents, execution requirements, portability, sanctions for dishonor of a power of attorney, and restrictions on authority that has the potential to dissipate a principal's property or alter a principal's estate plan.

A national survey was then conducted by the Joint Editorial Board for Uniform Trust and Estate Acts (JEB) to ascertain whether there was actual divergence of opinion about default rules for powers of attorney or only the lack of a detailed uniform model. The survey was distributed to probate and elder law sections of all state bar associations, to the fellows of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel, the leadership of the ABA Section of Real Property, Probate and Trust Law and the National Academy of Elder Law

Attorneys, as well as to special interest list serves of the ABA Commission on Law and Aging. Forty- four jurisdictions were represented in the 371 surveys returned.

The survey responses demonstrated a consensus of opinion in excess of seventy percent that a power of attorney statute should:

provide for confirmation that contingent powers are activated;
revoke a spouse-agent's authorityupon the dissolution or annulment of the marriage to the principal;
include a portability provision;
require gift making authority to be expressly stated in the grant of authority;
provide a default standard for fiduciary duties;
permit the principal to alter the default fiduciary standard;
require notice by an agent whenthe agent is no longer willing or able to act;
include safeguards against abuseby the agent;
include remedies and sanctions for abuse by the agent;
protect the reliance of other persons on a power of attorney; and
include remedies and sanctionsfor refusal of other persons to honor a power of attorney.

Informed by the review and the survey results, the Conference's drafting process also incorporated input from the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel, the ABA Section of Real Property,

Probate and Trust Law, the ABA

Commission on Law and Aging, the Joint Editorial Board for Uniform Trust and Estate Acts, the National Conference of

Lawyers and Corporate Fiduciaries, American Bankers Association, AARP, other professional groups, as well as numerous individual lawyers and corporate counsel. As a result of this process, the Act codifies both state legislative trends and collective best practices, and strikes a balance between the need for flexibility and acceptance of an agent's authority and the need to prevent and redress financial abuse.

While the Act contains safeguards for the protection of an incapacitated principal, the Act is primarily a set of default rules that preserve a principal's freedom to choose both the extent of an agent's authority and the principles to govern the agent's conduct. Among the Act's features that enhance drafting flexibility are the statutory definitions of powers in Subpart 2, which can be incorporated by reference in an individually drafted power of attorney or selected for inclusion on the optional statutory form provided in Subpart 3. The statutory definitions of enumerated powers are an updated version of those in the Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act (1988), which the Act supersedes. The national review found that eighteen jurisdictions had adopted some type of statutory form power of attorney. The decision to include a statutory form power of attorney in the Act was based on this trend and the proliferation of power of attorney forms currently available to the public.

Sections 15-14-719 and 15-14-720 of the Act address the problem of persons refusing to accept an agent's authority. Section 15-14-719 provides protection from liability for persons that in good faith accept an acknowledged power of attorney. Section 15-14-720 sanctions refusal to accept an acknowledged power of attorney unless the refusal meets limited statutory exceptions. An alternate Section 15-14-720 is provided for states that may wish to limit sanctions to refusal of an acknowledged statutory form power of attorney.

In exchange for mandated acceptance of an agent's authority, the Act does not require persons that deal with an agent to investigate the agent or the agent's actions. Instead, safeguards against abuse are provided through heightened requirements for granting authority that could dissipate the principal's property or alter the principal's estate plan (Section 1514-724(1)), provisions that set outthe agent's duties and liabilities (Sections 15-14-714 and 15-14-717) and by specification of the categories of persons that have standing to request judicial review of the agent's conduct (Section 15-14-716). The following provides a brief overview of the entire Act.

Overview of the Uniform Power of

Attorney Act

The Act consists of 4 Subparts. The basic substance of the Act is located in subparts 1 and 2. Subpart 3 contains the optional statutory form and Subpart 4 consists of miscellaneous provisions dealing with general application of the Act and repeal of certain prior acts.

Subpart 1 -- General Provisions and Definitions -- Section 15-14-702 lists definitions which are useful in interpretation of the Act. Of particular note is the definition of "incapacity" which replaces the term "disability" used in the Original Act. The definition of "incapacity" is consistent with the standard for appointment of a conservator under Section 401 of Uniform Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Act as amended in 1997. Another significant change in terminology from the Original Act is the use of "agent" in place of the term "attorney in fact." The term "agent" was also used in the Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act and is intended to clarify confusion in the lay public about the meaning of "attorney in fact." Section 15-14-703 provides that the Act is to apply broadly to all powers of attorney, but excepts from the Act powers of attorney for health care and certain specialized powers such as those coupled with an interest or dealing with proxy voting.

Another innovation is the default rule in Section 15-14-704 that a power of attorney is durable unless it contains express language indicating otherwise. This change from the Original Act reflects the view that mostprincipals prefer their powers of attorney to be durable as a hedge against the need for guardianship. While the Original Act was silent on execution requirements for a power of attorney, Section 15-14-705 requires the principal's signature and provides that an acknowledged signature is presumed genuine. Section 15-14-706 recognizes military powers of attorney and powers of attorney properly executed in other states or countries, or which were properly executed in the state of enactment prior to the Act's effective date. Section 1514-707 states a choice of law rule for determining the law that governs the meaning and effect of a power of attorney.

Section 15-14-708 addresses the relationship of the agent to a later courtappointed fiduciary. The Original Act conferred upon a conservator or other laterappointed fiduciary the same power to revoke or amend the power of attorney as the principal would have had prior to incapacity. In contrast, the Act reserves this power to the court and states that the agent's authority continues until limited, suspended, or terminated by the court. This approach reflects greater deference for the previously expressed preferences of the principal and is consistent with the state legislative trend that has departed from the Original Act.

The default rule for when a power of attorney becomes effective is stated in Section 15-14-709. Unless the principal specifies that it is to become effective upon a future date, event, or contingency, the authority of an agent under a power of attorney becomes effective when the power is executed. Section 15-14-709 permits the principal to designate who may determine when contingent powers are triggered. If the trigger for contingent powers is the principal's incapacity, Section 15-14-709 provides that the person designated to make that determination has the authority to act as the principal's personal representative under the Health Insurance Portability andAccountability Act (HIPAA) for purposes of accessing the principal's healthcare information and communicating with the principal's health-care provider. This provision does not, however, confer on the designated person the authority to make health-care decisions for the principal. If the trigger for contingent powers is incapacity but the principal has not designated anyone to make the determination, or the person authorized is unable or unwilling to make the determination, the determination may be made by a physician or licensed psychologist, who must find that principal's ability to manage property or business affairs is impaired, or by an attorney at law, judge, or appropriate governmental official, who must find that the principal is missing, detained, or unable to return to the United States.

The bases for termination of a power of attorney are covered in Section 15-14710. In response to concerns expressed in the JEB survey, the Act provides as the default rule that authority granted to a principal's spouse is revoked upon the commencement of proceedings for legal separation, marital dissolution or annulment.

Sections 15-14-711 through 15-14718 address matters related to the agent, including default rules for coagents and successor agents (Section 15-14-711), reimbursement and compensation (Section 15-14-712), an agent's acceptance of appointment (Section 15-14-713), and the agent's duties (Section 15-14-714). Section 15-14-715 provides that a principal may lower the standard of liability for agent conduct subject to a minimum level of accountability for actions taken dishonestly, with an improper motive, or with reckless indifference to the purposes of the power of attorney or the best interest of the principal. Section 15-14-716 sets out a comprehensive list of persons that may petition the court to review the agent's conduct and Section 1514-717 addresses agent liability. An agentmay resign by following the notice procedures described in Section 15-14-718.

Sections 15-14-719 and 15-14-720 are included in the Act to address the frequently reported problem of persons refusing to accept a power of attorney. Section 15-14-719 protects persons that in good faith accept an acknowledged power of attorney without actual knowledge that the power of attorney is revoked, terminated, or invalid or that the agent is exceeding or improperly exercising the agent's powers. Subject to statutory exceptions, alternative Sections 15-14- 720 impose liability for refusal to accept a power of attorney. Alternative A sanctions refusal of an acknowledged power of attorney and Alternative B sanctions only refusal of an acknowledged statutory form power of attorney.

Sections 15-14-721 through 15-14723 address the relationship of the Act to other law. Section 15-14-721 clarifies that the Act is supplemented by the principles of common law and equity to the extent those principles are not displaced by a specific provision of the Act, and Section 15-14-722 further clarifies that the Act is not intended to supersede any law applicable to financial institutions or other entities. With respect to remedies, Section 15-14-723 provides that the remedies under the Act are not exclusive and do not abrogate any other cause of action or remedy that may be available under the law of the enacting jurisdiction.

Subpart 2 -- Authority -- The Act offers the drafting attorney enhanced flexibility whether drafting an individually tailored power of attorney or using the statutory form. Like the Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act, Sections 1514-727 through 15-14-740 of the Act set forth detailed descriptions of authority relating to subjects such as "real property," "retirement plans," and "taxes," which a principal, pursuant to Section 15-14-702, mayincorporate in full into the power of attorney either by a reference to the short

descriptive term for the subject used in the Act or to the section number. Section 15-14702 further states that a principal may modify in a power of attorney any authority incorporated by reference. The definitions in

Subpart 2 also provide meaning for authority with respect to subjects enumerated on the optional statutory form in Subpart 3. Section 15-14-726 applies to all incorporated authority and grants of general authority, providing further detail on how the authority is to be construed.

Subpart 2 also addresses concerns about authority that might be used to dissipate the principal's property or alter the principal's estate plan. Section 15-14-721(1) lists specific categories of authority that cannot be implied from a grant of general authority, but which may be granted only through express language in the power of attorney. Section 15-14-724(2) contains a default rule prohibiting an agent that is not an ancestor, spouse, or descendant of the principal from creating in the agent or in a person to whom the agent owes a legal obligation of support an interest in the principal's property, whether by gift, right of survivorship, beneficiary designation, disclaimer, or otherwise.

Subpart 3 -- Statutory Forms -Theoptional form in Subpart 3 is designed for use by lawyers as well as lay persons. It contains, in plain language, instructions to the principal and agent. Step-by-step prompts are given for designation of the agent and successor agents, and grant of general and specific authority. In the section of the form addressing general authority, the principal must initial the subjects over which the principal wishes to delegate general authority to the agent. In the section of the form addressing specific authority, the Section 15-14-724(1) categories of specific authority are listed, preceded by a warning to the principal about the potential consequences of granting such authority to an agent. The principal is instructed to initial only the specific categories of actions that the principal intends to authorize. Subpart 3 also contains a sample agent certification form.

Subpart 4 -- Miscellaneous

OFFICIAL GENERAL COMMENT

Provisions -- The miscellaneous provisions in Article 4 clarify the relationship of the Act to other law and pre-existing powers of attorney. Enacting jurisdictions should repeal their existing power of attorney statutes, including, if applicable, the Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act, The Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act, and Article 5, Part 5 of the Uniform Probate Code.

The Uniform Power of Attorney Act replaces the Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act, the Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act, and Article 5, Part 5 of the Uniform Probate Code. The primary purpose of the Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act was to provide individuals with an inexpensive, non-judicial method of surrogate property management in the event of later incapacity. Two key concepts were introduced by the Uniform Durable Power ofAttorney Act: 1) creation of a durable agency one that survives, or is triggered by, the principal's incapacity, and 2) validation of post-mortem exercise of powers by an agent who acts in good faith and without actual knowledge of the principal's death. The success of the Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act is evidenced by the widespread use of durable powers in every jurisdiction, not only for incapacity planning, but also for convenience while the principal retainscapacity. However, the limitations of the Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act are evidenced by the number of states that have supplemented and revised their statutes to address myriad issues upon which the Uniform Durable Power of

Attorney Act is silent. These issues include parameters for the creation and use of powers of attorney as well as guidelines for the principal, the agent, and the person who is asked to accept the agent's authority. The general provisions and definitions of Article 1 in the Uniform Power of Attorney Act address those issues.

In addition to providing greater detail than the Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act, this Act changes two presumptions in the earlier act: 1) that a power of attorney is not durable unless it contains language to make it durable; and 2) that a later court-appointed fiduciary for the principal has the power to revoke or amend a previously executed power of attorney. Section 15-14-704 of this Subpart 1 reverses the non-durability presumption by stating that a power of attorney is durable unless it expressly provides that it is terminated by the incapacity of the principal. Section 1514-708 gives deference to the principal's choice of agent by providing that if a court appoints a fiduciary to manage some or all of the principal's property, the agent's authority continues unless limited, suspended, or terminated by the court.

Although the Act is primarily a defaultstatute, Subpart 1 also contains rules that govern all powers of attorney subject to the Act. Examples of these rules include imposition of certain minimum fiduciary duties on an agent who has accepted appointment (Section 15-14-714(1)), recognition of persons who have standing to request judicial construction of the power of attorney or review of the agent's conduct (Section 15-14-716), and protections for persons who accept an acknowledged power of attorney without actual knowledge that the power of attorney or the agent's authority is void, invalid, or terminated, or that the agent is exceeding or improperly exercising the power (Section 15-14-719). In contrast with the rules of general application in Subpart 1, the default provisions are clearly indicated by signals such as "unless the power of attorney otherwise provides,"or "except as otherwise provided in the power of attorney." These signals alert the draftsperson to options for enlarging or limiting the Act's default terms. For example, default provisions in Article 1 state that, unless the power of attorney otherwise provides, the power of attorney is effective immediately (Section 15-14-709), coagents may exercise their authority independently (Section 15-14-711), and an agent is entitled to reimbursement of expenses reasonably incurred and to reasonable compensation (Section 15-14712).

SUBPART 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Previous Next

Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Colorado may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

2020 Colorado Revised StatutesTitle 15 - Probate, Trusts, And FiduciariesArticle 14. Persons Under Disability - Protection

2020 Colorado Revised Statutes
Title 15 - Probate, Trusts, And Fiduciaries
Article 14. Persons Under Disability - Protection