State v. William K. Brown

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. February 5, 2003 A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Appeals Appeal No. Cir. Ct. No. 01-TR-13416 02-1691 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. WILLIAM K. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: MICHAEL O. BOHREN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, P.J.1 William K. Brown appeals from an order revoking his driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical test pursuant to the implied consent law, WIS. STAT. § 343.305. Brown contends that the statute 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (19992000). All statutory references are to the 1999-2000 version. No. 02-1691 unconstitutionally coerces consent by threatening the revocation of the suspect s driving privileges. We recently rejected this very argument in State v. Wintlend, 2002 WI App 314, No. 02-0965-CR. We affirm on the basis of Wintlend. By the Court. Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. 809.23(1)(b)4. 2 See WIS. STAT. RULE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.