David Lang v. Dianne J. Seibert
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 96-1176-FT
STATE OF WISCONSIN
IN COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT III
DAVID LANG and
THOMAS LANG,
Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
ERRATA SHEET
DIANNE J. SEIBERT,
Defendant-Appellant.
Marilyn L. Graves
Clerk of Court of Appeals
P.O. Box 1688
Madison, WI 53702
Peg Carlson
Chief Staff Attorney
119 Martin Luther King Blvd.
Madison, WI 53703
Court of Appeals District I
633 W. Wisconsin Ave.
Milwaukee, WI 53203
Court of Appeals District II
2727 N. Grandview Blvd.
Waukesha, WI 53188-1672
Trial Court Clerk
Sawyer County Courthouse
406 Main
Hayward, Wi 54843
Court of Appeals District IV
119 Martin Luther King Blvd.
Madison, WI 53703
Jennifer Krapf
Administrative Assistant
119 Martin Luther King Blvd.
Madison, WI 53703
Hon. Norman L. Yackel
Circuit Judge
Sawyer County Courthouse
Hayward, WI 54843
David M. Weiby
1109 Tower Ave.
Superior, WI 54880
Robert Kanuit
Weiby, Maki, Durst, Ledin
1109 Tower Ave.
Superior, WI 54880
Gregory A. Jennings
1128 2nd St., Box 726
Chetek, WI 54728
No. 96-1176-FT
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached page one is to be
substituted for page one in the above-captioned opinion which was released on
November 5, 1996.
Dated this 5th day of December, 2006.
-2-
COURT OF APPEALS
DECISION
DATED AND RELEASED
NOTICE
NOVEMBER 5, 1996
A party may file with the Supreme Court
a petition to review an adverse decision
by the Court of Appeals. See ยง 808.10 and
RULE 809.62(1), STATS.
This opinion is subject to further editing.
If published, the official version will
appear in the bound volume of the
Official Reports.
No. 96-1176-FT
STATE OF WISCONSIN
IN COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT III
DAVID LANG
and THOMAS LANG,
Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
DIANNE J. SEIBERT,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Sawyer County:
NORMAN L. YACKEL, Judge. Affirmed.
Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Dianne Seibert appeals a summary judgment for
specific performance of an offer to purchase contract she entered into with
David and Thomas Lang.1 Seibert argues that (1) disputed issues of material
fact preclude
1
This is an expedited appeal under RULE 809.17, STATS.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.