In the Matter of the Guardianship of: Andrea Faye Wilkins (Majority)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED AUGUST 15, 2019 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE In the Matter of the Guardianship of: ANDREA FAYE WILKINS, An Incapacitated Person. ) ) ) ) ) No. 36649-9-III UNPUBLISHED OPINION PENNELL, J. — Judy Vrabel appeals the superior court’s order denying her motion to revise an order appointing her adult daughter, Jody Stack, as guardian for her other adult daughter, Andrea Wilkins. We affirm the superior court and grant Ms. Stack’s request for attorney fees and costs. FACTS Andrea Wilkins, an adult incapacitated person, moved in with her adult sister, Jody Stack, in April 2016. Prior to this, Ms. Wilkins lived with her mother, Judy Vrabel. Due to some family tensions, both Ms. Vrabel and Ms. Stack filed dueling petitions for guardianship of Ms. Wilkins. A court-appointed guardian ad litem (GAL) conducted an investigation and recommended Ms. Stack be appointed guardian. The GAL also noted that Ms. Vrabel had been collecting Social Security payments for Ms. Wilkins, despite the fact that Ms. Wilkins no longer lived with Ms. Vrabel. The guardianship court ultimately followed the GAL’s recommendation and appointed Ms. Stack as full guardian of Ms. Wilkins’s person and estate. The court also No. 36649-9-III In re Guardianship of Wilkins entered a judgment for the Social Security payments that had been improperly retained by Ms. Vrabel. Ms. Vrabel appeals the guardianship order. ANALYSIS Ms. Vrabel’s sole argument on appeal is that the guardianship court impermissibly terminated her parental rights to Ms. Wilkins without a finding of parental unfitness. This claim fails. The guardianship court did not improperly terminate Ms. Vrabel’s parental rights because there were none remaining to terminate. A parent’s constitutional right to involvement in childrearing only applies to minor children. In re Dependency of Schermer, 161 Wn.2d 927, 941, 169 P.3d 452 (2007) (“Parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care and welfare of their minor children.”) (emphasis added); In re Guardianship of Cornelius, 181 Wn. App. 513, 531, 326 P.3d 718 (2014). Ms. Wilkins is an adult. The legal standards governing termination of parental rights are inapplicable here. ATTORNEY FEES/COSTS Ms. Stack requests attorney fees and costs, claiming Ms. Vrabel (1) lacks standing to bring this appeal, (2) claims errors not raised before the guardianship court, and (3) needlessly challenges what was a proper exercise of the guardianship court’s discretion. See In re Guardianship of Decker, 188 Wn. App. 429, 445-46, 451-52, 353 P.3d 669, review denied, 184 Wn.2d 1015 (2015) (awarding attorney fees to guardian 2 No. 36649-9-III In re Guardianship of Wilkins who defended appeal by ward’s former attorney who sought to “vindicate” ward’s due process rights). Ms. Stack’s criticisms of Ms. Vrabel’s arguments on appeal are well taken. We therefore grant Ms. Stack’s request for fees and costs pursuant to RAP 18.1(a) and RCW 11.96A.150 (Attorney fees are available in guardianship matters “in such amount and in such manner as the court determines to be equitable.”). CONCLUSION The superior court’s order denying revision of the appointment of Ms. Stack as guardian of Ms. Wilkins’s person and estate is affirmed. Ms. Stack’s request for attorney fees and costs is granted subject to her timely compliance with RAP 18.1(d). A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW 2.06.040. _________________________________ Pennell, J. WE CONCUR: ______________________________ Lawrence-Berrey, C.J. _________________________________ Fearing, J. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.