State Of Washington, Respondent V. Antonio Glanz, Appellant (Majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two May 9, 2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 48268-1-II Respondent, v. ANTONIO GLANZ, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. SUTTON, J. — On October 20, 2015, the juvenile court found Antonia Glanz guilty of one count of assault in the second degree and one count of making false statements to a public servant. Glanz appealed arguing that the trial court erred by failing to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by JuCr 7.11(d). On June 15, 2016, the juvenile court entered written findings of fact and conclusions of law. The State moved to supplement the record to include the juvenile court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. A commissioner of this court granted the State’s motion to supplement the record and ordered Glanz to file a supplemental brief. After reviewing the findings of fact and conclusions of law, Glanz found “no legal basis for filing an amended brief” and declined to do so. Letter to clerk of the court dated Sept. 7, 2016. Glanz’s sole assignment of error is the juvenile court’s failure to comply with JuCr 7.11(d) by not entering written findings of fact and conclusions of law. The juvenile court has now entered No. 47478-6-II written findings of fact and conclusions of law; therefore, there is no error. Accordingly, we affirm. A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered. SUTTON, J. We concur: MAXA, A.C.J. WORSWICK, J. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
