State Of Washington, Respondent vs. Ronald Spinks, Appellant (Majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
sZy Psi • ......3 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ca "^4 ' rn , 3>v../ •j' --4....4 C:)...n STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ) ) ) ) ) ___....V." ••••• ::.1". No. 76208-7-1 ,nr3r- CA rri 0 = => -....— UNPUBLISHED OPINI51 mu) —4c) r.n ent ........ .&.. =*IC 1.-• ) RONALD SPINKS, Appellant. ) ) ) FILED: July 17, 2017 PER CURIAM-Ronald Spinks appeals the judgment and sentence entered after he pleaded guilty to felony harassment — domestic violence, assault in the third degree — domestic violence, malicious mischief in the second degree — domestic violence, and misdemeanor violation of a court order — domestic violence. We accept the State of Washington's concession that Spinks was misadvised of his maximum sentence and that his guilty plea was therefore not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. See State v. Mendoza, 157 Wn.2d 582, 592, 141 P.3d 49(2006). Accordingly, we remand to allow Spinks the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea. Id. Spinks also argues that the combined term of confinement and community custody exceeds the statutory maximum. In his Statement of Additional Grounds for Review, Spinks contends that his offender score was miscalculated. Because Spinks NO. 76208-7-1/2 may choose to withdraw his guilty plea on remand, we do not address these contentions. Remanded for further proceedings. FOR THE COURT: cAI/.. . . . . • •.I..)J k eD -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
