State Of Washington, Respondent V. Brian R. Dansie, Petitioner (Majority)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON • STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BRIAN DANSIE, Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 76133-1 DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: APR 1 7 2017 PER CURIAM. - Petitioner Brian Dansie has filed a motion for discretionary review of trial court orders denying his motion to vacate the record of his criminal conviction. The State of Washington filed a motion to concede error and remand for a new hearing. Dansie filed an answer to the State's motion, and the State has filed a reply. The motion for discretionary review is granted. We also accept the State's concession of error in part, accelerate review, and remand. On remand, the trial court is directed to clarify on the record the "good cause" reason for denying the motion to vacate under RCW 9.94A.640. We decline Dansie's request that the matter be remanded for a new hearing before a different judge. Remanded for further proceedings. For the Court: (71 rrl :La —n > co, m c? r\,)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.