State Of Washington, Respondent V. Daniel Albert Belleque, Appellant (Majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, No. 73034-7-1 UNPUBLISHED OPINION v. DANIEL ALBERT BELLEQUE, FILED: JAN 1 9 2016 Appellant. Per Curiam — Daniel Belleque appeals his convictions for burglary in the second degree and theft in the third degree. Belleque contends, and the State K Ln concedes, that he was denied his constitutional right to self-representation. See State v. Madsen, 168 Wn.2d 496, 229 P.3d 714 (2010). We accept the State's concession,©? -E~ reverse Belleque's convictions, and remand the matter for a new trial. In his statement of additional grounds for review, Belleque contends that the trial court violated his CrR 3.3 speedy trial rights. But his conclusory allegations provide no basis for appellate review. See RAP 10.10(c). Because we reverse Belleque's convictions and remand for a new trial, the remaining allegations in his statement of additional grounds are moot. Reversed and remanded. FOR THE COURT: V CX
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
