State Of Washington, Respondent V. Richard William Trainer, Appellant (Majority)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

(- IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 70458-3-1 Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION RICHARD WILLIAM TRAINER, FILED: JUL 7 2014 Appellant. Per Curiam -- Richard Trainer appeals his conviction for attempted first degree theft, arguing that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it had a "duty to return a verdict of guilty" if it found all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. This argument is controlled by our decision in State v. Ryan P. Moore, , 318 P.3d 296 (2014) and the cases cited therein. Affirmed. For the court: _-** -, ¢;... O \S" C/"- C' v *~T^ ~- ¢ ¢71'-'J So CO in o -m » *$££ !n~~~'r-^ 3 v_j ir: On) Wn. App.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.