State Of Washington, Respondent V. W.r., Jr., Appellant

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. W.R., JR., D.O.B. 09/26/96, Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 67340-8-I UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: October 29, 2012 Per Curiam W.R. appeals a juvenile court disposition finding him guilty of second degree rape by forcible compulsion. He contends the court erred in requiring him to prove that the charged act was consensual. He concedes this contention is at odds with State v. Camara, 113 Wn.2d 631, 781 P.2d 483 (1989), but argues that Camara rests on a flawed reading of United States Supreme Court precedent. Our Supreme Court rejected a similar challenge to Camara in State v. Gregory, 158 Wn.2d 759, 801-04, 147 P.3d 1201 (2006). Gregory and Camara control W.R. s contention here. Affirmed. FOR THE COURT: No. 68060-9-I/2 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.