State Of Washington, Respondent V. Daniel Keith Crane, Appellant
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) DANIEL CRANE, ) ) Appellant. ) ________________________________) DIVISION ONE No. 65744-5-I UNPUBLISHED OPINION ON REMAND FILED: November 26, 2012 Dwyer, J. The Washington Supreme Court granted the State s petition for review of our first opinion in this matter and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of its decision in State v. Guzman Nuñez, 174 Wn.2d 707, 285 P.3d 21 (2012). In our first opinion, we followed State v. Bashaw, 169 Wn.2d 133, 234 P.3d 195 (2010), and vacated an exceptional sentence imposed following Daniel Crane s conviction of felony harassment. Because the trial court instructed the jury that it must be unanimous in order to answer no on the verdict form for the aggravating factors supporting the exceptional sentence, we determined that this instruction was erroneous under Bashaw. In Guzman Nuñez, however, the Supreme Court overruled Bashaw, expressly approving the instruction given by the trial court in this case. Thus, No. 65744-5-I/2 there was no trial court error. Affirmed. We concur: -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
