Supreme Court of Virginia Decisions 1949

Stamps v. Williamson
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 145
Docket Number: 3525

Allaun v. First, Etc., Nat. Bank
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 104
Docket Number: 3526

Miller v. Bennett
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 162
Docket Number: 3527

Luedtke v. Phillips
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 207
Docket Number: 3529

Williams v. Snider
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 226
Docket Number: 3530

Ambrose v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 189
Docket Number: 3534

Henning v. Kyle
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 247
Docket Number: 3536

Overton v. Slaughter
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 172
Docket Number: 3537

Parker v. American Lbr. Corp.
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 181
Docket Number: 3563

Williams v. Commonwealth
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 280
Docket Numbers: 3565, 3566, 3567

Randolph v. Commonwealth
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 256
Docket Number: 3575

Epps v. Commonwealth
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 93
Docket Numbers: 3580, 3581

Batten v. Commonwealth
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 235
Docket Number: 3584

Wesley v. Commonwealth
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 268
Docket Number: 3591

Robinson v. Commonwealth
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 134
Docket Number: 3597

Tann v. Commonwealth
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 154
Docket Number: 3611

Baylor v. Commonwealth
Date: November 21, 1949
Citation: 190 Va. 116
Docket Number: 3614

The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.