Willetta Blount Holmes v. City of Richmond Department of Social Services
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Alston, Decker and Senior Judge Coleman WILLETTA BLOUNT HOLMES v. Record No. 0282-14-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 CITY OF RICHMOND DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND Margaret P. Spencer, Judge (Charles R. Samuels, on brief), for appellant. (Kate O Leary; Marc E. Yeaker, Guardian ad litem for the minor children; Office of the City Attorney, on brief), for appellee. Willetta Blount Holmes, mother, appeals an order terminating her parental rights to her children, S.H. and E.B., and approving a permanent goal of placement with relatives for her children, Al.B. and Av.B. Mother argues the trial court erred in: (1) holding that the Richmond Department of Social Services [(RDSS)] complied with its affirmative duty mandated by . . . Code § 16.1-283(A) to investigate all reasonable options for placement of a child with relatives as a condition precedent to entering an order terminating the residual parental rights of mother regarding S.H. and E.B.; (2) holding that mother failed to substantially remedy the conditions which led to or required the continuation of the foster care placement for the four children; (3) holding mother failed to maintain continuing contact with and provide or substantially plan for the future of the children for a period of six months after the placement of the children in foster care; and * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. (4) admitting into evidence Dr. Craig S. King s February 6, 2013 confidential psychological evaluation of mother. Mother appealed to the trial court the juvenile and domestic relations district court s orders terminating mother s parental rights to S.H. and E.B. and approving relative placement for Al.B. and Av.B. The trial court heard evidence and argument on January 7, 2014. On January 13, 2014, the trial court entered an order terminating mother s parental rights to S.H. and E.B. and approving relative placement for Al.B. and Av.B. On February 19, 2014, the trial court entered form orders entitled Order for Involuntary Termination of Residual Parental Rights for the children E.B. and S.H., citing Code § 16.1-283(C)(1) and (2) as the bases for the terminations. On June 6, 2014, mother filed in the trial court the transcript of the January 7, 2014 trial court hearing. Rule 5A:8(a) provides that a transcript is part of the record and can be considered on appeal when it is filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court within 60 days after entry of the final judgment. Thus, the January 7, 2014 transcript was not timely filed and we cannot consider it. We have reviewed the record and the opening brief. We conclude that a transcript or written statement of facts is indispensable to a determination of the assignments of error raised on appeal. See Anderson v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 506, 508-09, 413 S.E.2d 75, 76-77 (1992); Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96, 99-100, 341 S.E.2d 400, 402 (1986). An appellant has the responsibility to provide a complete record to the appellate court. Twardy v. Twardy, 14 Va. App. 651, 658, 419 S.E.2d 848, 852 (1992) (en banc). Since mother provided an insufficient record to this Court, we are unable to review her assignments of error. See Jenkins v. Winchester Dep t of Soc. Servs., 12 Va. App. 1178, 1185, 409 S.E.2d 16, 20 (1991) ( In the absence [of a sufficient record], we will not consider the point.); see also Barrett v. Barrett, 1 Va. App. 378, 380, 339 S.E.2d 208, 210 (1986) (holding that when a transcript is -2- indispensable to the determination of the issues on appeal, the timely filing of a transcript is jurisdictional). Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of the trial court. See Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
