Sandra Dellairo, Widow of Natan Dellairo, Deceased v. Rountree Construction Company, Inc., et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Alston, Decker and Senior Judge Coleman SANDRA DELLAIRO, WIDOW OF NATHAN DELLAIRO, DECEASED v. Record No. 0177-14-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM JUNE 3, 2014 ROUNTREE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND COMMONWEALTH CONTRACTORS GROUP SELF-INSURANCE ASSOCIATION/LANDIN INCORPORATED FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION (John H. Klein; Montagna, Klein, Camden LLP , on brief), for appellant. (Daniel E. Lynch; John T. Cornett, Jr.; Lynch & Cornett, PC, on brief), for appellees. Sandra Dellairo (claimant) appeals from a January 3, 2014 decision of the Workers Compensation Commission denying her claim for death benefits following the death of her husband after he underwent medical treatment for his September 18, 2009 work injury. On appeal, claimant contends the commission erred in finding that [she] failed to meet her burden of proof by establishing causal connection between the June 15, 2011 cervical epidural injection and the employee s death on June 19, 2011. Upon reviewing the record and the parties briefs, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission s decision. Rule 5A:27. We have reviewed the record and the commission s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. opinion. See Dellairo v. Rountree Constr. Co., Inc., VWC File No. VA00000162954 (Jan. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.