Sodexho, Inc. and et. al. v. Curtis Clanton
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Haley, Millette and Senior Judge Coleman SODEXHO, INC. AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA/AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC. v. Record No. 2364-07-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 12, 2008 CURTIS CLANTON FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Bryan J. Olmos; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on brief), for appellants. (Louis D. Snesil; Marks & Harrison, on brief), for appellee. Sodexho, Inc. and its insurer contend the Workers Compensation Commission erred in finding that Curtis Clanton proved he sustained a compensable change in condition and awarding him temporary total disability benefits commencing April 14, 2006. We have reviewed the record and the commission s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Clanton v. Sodexho, Inc., VWC File No. 221-53-73 (Aug. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 1 Affirmed. * 1 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. In rendering our decision, we have considered only those documents which were in the record and properly before the commission when it rendered its decision.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
