Naomi Mitchell Tucker v. Randstad Staffing Services, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Elder, Felton and Senior Judge Willis NAOMI MITCHELL TUCKER v. Record No. 2640-05-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 21, 2006 RANDSTAD STAFFING SERVICES, INC. AND ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Naomi M. Tucker, pro se, on brief). (Joseph F. Giordano; Bryan J. Olmos; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on brief), for appellees. Naomi Mitchell Tucker appeals a decision of the Workers Compensation Commission finding that she failed to prove (1) her alleged low back, pelvis, right hip, left rib, and left leg problems were causally related to her compensable March 17, 2004 injury by accident; (2) she was disabled after July 25, 2004 as a result of her compensable work accident; and (3) she was entitled to a change in treating physicians to Dr. Lawrence Morales. We have reviewed the record and the commission s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Tucker v. Randstad Staffing Servs., Inc., VWC File No. 218-60-54 (Aug. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
