The Kroger Company and Continental Casualty Company v. Diane L. Rouleau
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, Beales and Senior Judge Fitzpatrick THE KROGER COMPANY AND CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Record No. 0845-06-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM AUGUST 15, 2006 DIANE L. ROULEAU FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Mary Beth Nash; Frankl, Miller & Webb, LLP, on brief), for appellants. (Diane L. Rouleau, pro se, on brief). Kroger Company and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as employer ) appeal a decision of the Workers Compensation Commission finding that Diane L. Rouleau s decision to refuse employer s offer of selective employment was reasonable and not unjustified. We have reviewed the record and the commission s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Rouleau v. Kroger Company, VWC File No. 202-53-23 (Mar. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
