Jacqueline L. Palmer Mercer v. Support Services of Virginia, Inc., et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton JACQUELINE L. PALMER MERCER v. Record No. 0238-05-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM MAY 24, 2005 SUPPORT SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC. AND TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Jacqueline L. (Palmer) Mercer, pro se, on brief). (Adam S. Rafal; Vandeventer Black L.L.P., on brief), for appellees. Jacqueline L. Palmer Mercer (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers Compensation Commission denying her claim seeking an award of additional wage loss compensation and payment of certain medical bills. The commission found that claimant s claim for additional wage loss compensation was barred by the two-year time limitation contained in Code § 65.2-708 and that she was not entitled to payment for certain medical expenses because they arose from unauthorized medical treatment.1 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Palmer v. Support Services of Virginia, Inc., VWC File No. 187-49-73 (Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal * 1 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. To the extent that claimant s brief raises numerous arguments and issues that are not germane to the issues which were properly before the commission or which have been previously fully and fairly litigated and which were not properly before the commission when it rendered its January 5, 2005 opinion, we have not considered those arguments and/or issues in summarily affirming the commission s decision. contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
