Susan Elaine Manola v. Fairfax County School Board
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judge Bumgardner and Senior Judge Hodges SUSAN ELAINE MANOLA v. Record No. 2367-03-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM JUNE 29, 2004 FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Kathleen G. Walsh, on brief), for appellant. (Michael N. Salveson; Hunton & Williams, LLP, on brief), for appellee. Susan Elaine Manola (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers Compensation Commission finding that she failed to prove the medical treatment rendered by Dr. Stephen M. Levin from November 2000 through July 16, 2001, constituted reasonable and necessary medical attention within the meaning of the Workers Compensation Act. We have reviewed the record and the commission s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Manola v. Fairfax (County of) School Board, VWC File No. 199-88-11 (Aug. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.1 Affirmed. * 1 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. Because we summarily affirm the commission s decision, we will assume, without deciding, that claimant timely filed her notice of appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
