Carmel Green Houses, et al. v Mohammad Hammoudeh
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick CARMEL GREEN HOUSES, INC. and FLORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Record No. 1260-97-4 MOHAMMAD HAMMOUDEH MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM OCTOBER 14, 1997 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Alan D. Sundburg; Friedlander, Misler, Friedlander, Sloan & Herz, on brief), for appellants. (Lawrence J. Pascal; Ashcraft & Gerel, on brief), for appellee. Carmel Green Houses, Inc. and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as employer) contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission (commission) erred in finding that Mohammad Hammoudeh (claimant) proved that he earned a post-injury average weekly wage of $250. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. Beginning in 1994, claimant became self-employed buying and selling automobiles. Claimant testified that he earned approximately $200 to $250 per week. Claimant produced a profit and loss statement for the six-month period ending June 30, 1996. Claimant's accountant generated the statement based upon * Pursuant to Code ยง 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. claimant's business records. Employer did not introduce evidence to dispute claimant's testimony nor did employer request any discovery with respect to claimant's average weekly wage. Based upon this record, the commission awarded claimant benefits based upon a $250 average weekly wage. "It was the duty of the Commission to make the best possible estimate of . . . impairments of earnings from the evidence adduced at the hearing, and to determine the average weekly wage . . . ." Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Reeves, 1 Va. App. 435, 441, 339 S.E.2d 570, 573 (1986). "This is a question of fact to be determined by the Commission which, if based on credible evidence, will not be disturbed on appeal." Id. "Thus, if credible evidence supports the commission's findings regarding the claimant's average weekly wage, we must uphold those findings." Chesapeake Bay Seafood House v. Clements, 14 Va. App. 143, 146, 415 S.E.2d 864, 866 (1992). Claimant's unrebutted testimony, which was corroborated by the profit and loss statement, constitutes credible evidence to support the commission's findings. those findings on appeal. Therefore, we must uphold Employer's contention that claimant failed to meet his burden of proof because he did not produce additional business records is without merit. Employer had every opportunity to offer evidence to rebut claimant's testimony, but failed to do so. For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 2 Affirmed. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
