Charles Nathaniel Ross v Commonwealth of Virginia

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Willis and Annunziata Argued at Richmond, Virginia CHARLES NATHANIEL ROSS v. Record No. 0068-97-2 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. DECEMBER 23, 1997 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BUCKINGHAM COUNTY Timothy J. Hauler, Judge Robert H. Gray, Jr., for appellant. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General (Richard Cullen, Attorney General; John K. Byrum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. 1. Ross invokes proof that he knew the vehicle was occupied only as an element of malice for purposes of the instruction on murder. He acknowledges that such proof was not required to prove manslaughter. Because Ross was not convicted of murder, but was convicted of manslaughter, his contention that the murder instruction was deficient is moot. 2. Because Ross did not present his double-jeopardy contention to the trial court and did not preserve that contention properly for appeal, we will not consider it. 5A:18. Rule The record in this case presents no reason for us to invoke the ends of justice exception to the application of that rule. * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Affirmed. - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.