Alvin Jerome Patterson v Commonwealth
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia ALVIN JEROME PATTERSON v. Record No. 2733-95-1 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON NOVEMBER 26, 1996 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF YORK COUNTY Russell M. Carneal, Judge Designate Sydney K. L. West (Horne, West & McMurtrie, P.C., on brief), for appellant. Margaret Ann B. Walker, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. Alvin Jerome Patterson was convicted by a jury of shooting from a vehicle in violation of § 18.2-286.1, shooting at an occupied vehicle in violation of § 18.2-154, and attempted malicious wounding in violation of § 18.2-26. He contends on appeal that the trial court erred by refusing to admit into evidence certain letters that he claims impeach a witness for the Commonwealth. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. The two letters in question were written to Patterson by Cleo Harper, an eyewitness to the shooting. They were written after Patterson's arrest, and contain statements professing Harper's affection for Patterson. One letter makes reference to another woman with apparent interest in Patterson, but falls * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. short of establishing any relationship between the two. Patterson claims that the letters show that he and Harper were in a relationship, and that Harper found out about this other woman, resulting in her motive to testify against him. The trial court's refusal to admit these letters, he argues, prevented him from properly impeaching a Commonwealth's witness. We disagree. against Patterson. The letters show no real bias by Harper Any claim of a jealous motive is supported by neither the content of the letters nor anything else in the record. The excluded letters would therefore add nothing to the evidence presented to the jury. Furthermore, although these two letters were not admitted, two other cards sent by Harper to Patterson were admitted. Harper also testified at trial as to her continual affection for Patterson while he was awaiting trial. Thus, if any error occurred, it was harmless. Find no reversible error, we affirm. Affirmed. - 2 -
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
