Linda Julia Miller v Laubscher, etc., et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis LINDA JULIA MILLER v. MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM SEPTEMBER 19, 1995 Record No. 0855-95-4 LAUBSCHER, PRESTA & LAUBSCHER AND STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Robert B. Adams; Ashcraft & Gerel, on brief), for appellant. (Ruth N. Carter; Midkiff & Hiner, on brief), for appellees. Linda Julia Miller contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in suspending her compensation benefits. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. affirm the commission's decision. Accordingly, we summarily Rule 5A:27. On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the employer, the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). Factual findings made by the commission must be upheld by this Court if supported by credible evidence. James v. Capitol Steel Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 833, 835 (1989). Miller argues that the record contains no credible evidence * Pursuant to Code ยง 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. that she failed to cooperate with employer's vocational rehabilitation efforts. In granting employer's application seeking to suspend Miller's compensation benefits, the commission found as follows: We do not find that [Miller] cooperated with rehabilitation efforts. According to the treating physician, Dr. [Khosrow] Matini, [Miller] had the ability to perform sedentary work, including writing with a pencil, pushing buttons, and driving a standard shift automobile. Yet [Miller] has portrayed herself to potential employers as essentially unemployable, thus sabotaging efforts to find employment. It appears from the record that [Miller] was unwilling to attempt even a part-time job allowing her to work on the telephone at home scheduling truck pick-ups. The commission's findings are supported by Dr. Matini's medical reports and the testimony of the rehabilitation consultant, Patricia Wendy Held. Therefore, those findings are binding and conclusive upon us on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision to suspend benefits until Miller demonstrates a good faith effort to cooperate with rehabilitation efforts. Affirmed. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
