Cases Appealed to Supreme Court of Virginia

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been appealed to the Supreme Court: 1. David Brandon Cannady v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0810-21-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Callins on November 9, 2022 2. William Adam Boyd v. Constance Weisberg Record No. 0029-22-1 Opinion rendered by Judge Athey on November 15, 2022 3. Peter Timothy Gionis v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 1197-21-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Beales on November 22, 2022 4. Patrick Edward Cornell v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 1381-21-2 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on November 22, 2022 5. Michael Charles Hogle v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0027-22-3 Opinion rendered by Senior Judge Petty on November 22, 2022 The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been disposed of by the Supreme Court: 1. William Joseph Morgan v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 1139-20-1 Opinion rendered by Judge Huff on October 5, 2021 Judgment of Court of Appeals reversed and final judgment entered dismissing conviction by opinion rendered on December 29, 2022 (211033) 2. Virginia Manufacturers Association, et al. v. Ralph S. Northam, etc, et al. Record No. 0316-21-2 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on December 7, 2021 Refused (220077) 3. Jovan Anthony Ali v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0434-21-4 Opinion rendered by Chief Judge Decker on May 13, 2022 Refused (220393) 4. Clifton Thomas Jacks v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0833-20-3 En Banc Opinion rendered by Judge Huff on May 17, 2022 Refused (220354) 5. Jessie Lee Green v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0759-21-1 Opinion rendered by Judge Beales on June 14, 2022 Petition for appeal withdrawn (220458) 6. William O. Flannagan, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 093-21-2 Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee on August 16, 2022 Dismissed pursuant to Rule 5:14(a) (220582)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.