Cases Appealed to Supreme Court of Virginia

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DATE: August 3, 2021 The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been appealed to the Supreme Court: 1. Richard Roosevelt Hill v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0562-20-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on May 18, 2021 2. Rakim Malik Nottingham v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0340-20-1 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on May 25, 2021 3. Blake Andrew Mitchell, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 1976-18-1 Opinion rendered by Judge Russell on June 8, 2021 4. Michael Moreno, s/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 1801-19-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Athey on June 15, 2021 5. Moussa Moise Haba v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0256-20-4 Opinion rendered by Chief Judge Decker on June 15, 2021 The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been disposed of by the Supreme Court: 1. Olmedo Alberto Pena Pinedo v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0515-19-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on May 5, 2020 Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed by opinion rendered on July 8, 2021 (200748) 2. Endalkachew Merid v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 1145-19-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty on May 12, 2020 Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed by published order on July 1, 2021 (200799) 3. William Howard Robinson v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0154-19-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on July 7, 2020 Refused (200981) 4. Nicholas Lee Thomas v. Commonwealth of Virginia Record No. 0176-20-2 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on December 1, 2020 Refused (201572) On July 15, 2021 the Supreme Court issued an opinion in the following case, which had been appealed from this Court 1. Erin Marie Coster Evans v. James August Evans, Jr. Record No. 1666-19-3 Memorandum opinion rendered by Judge AtLee on July 21, 2020 Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed by opinion rendered on July 15, 2021 (201108)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.