Timothy Clark, etc. v Commonwealth
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Tuesday 25th February, 1997. Timothy Clark, s/k/a Timothy Lamont Clark, against Appellant, Record No. 2248-94-3 Circuit Court No. CR94010223-00 Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee. Upon Rehearing En Banc Before Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton Robert Bryan Haskins (Turner, Haskins & Whitfield, on brief), for appellant. Monica S. McElyea, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. By opinion dated July 16, 1996, a majority of a panel of this Court affirmed the decision of the trial court. Clark v. Commonwealth, 22 Va. App. 673, 473 S.E.2d 663 (1996). Timothy Clark, we granted a rehearing en banc. Upon motion of Upon such rehearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for those reasons set forth in the panel's majority opinion, and accordingly, the stay of this Court's July 16, 1996 mandate is lifted. Judge Benton would reverse the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the panel's dissenting opinion. See id. at 678, 473 S.E.2d at 665 (Benton, J., dissenting). It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. This amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the July 16, 1996 mandate. This order shall be published and certified to the trial court. A Copy, Teste: Cynthia L. McCoy, Clerk By: Deputy Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
