Aaron Augustis Witts v Commonwealth

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia AARON AUGUSTIS WITTS v. Record No. 0078-94-1 ORDER COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA UPON A REHEARING EN BANC Thomas W. Carpenter (Overman, Cowardin & Martin, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant. Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. By memorandum opinion issued April 4, 1995, a panel of this Court affirmed the conviction of Aaron Augustis Witts (appellant) for use of profane, threatening, or indecent language over public airways, in violation of Code § 18.2-427. Witts v. Commonwealth, No. 0078-94-1, 1995 WL 143096 (Va. Ct. App. April 4, 1995) (Benton, J., dissenting). On appellant's motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc which was heard on October 5, 1995. For the reasons stated in the panel majority opinion, the stay of the mandate of the April 4, 1995 opinion is vacated, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Judges Benton, Coleman, Elder, and Fitzpatrick, for the reasons stated in Judge Benton's panel dissent, would reverse the conviction. This order shall be published and certified to the trial court. Affirmed. - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.