Cheryl Jackson and John Harmon v. Megan Johnson Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Smith County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-22-00297-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS CHERYL JACKSON AND JOHN HARMON, APPELLANTS V. MEGAN JOHNSON, APPELLEE § APPEAL FROM THE § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay-at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas Supreme Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. An appellate court may enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. Id. After giving ten days’ notice, an appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). On November 15, 2022, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellants, Cheryl Jackson and John Harmon, that the filing fee in this appeal is due. Appellants were informed that failure to remit the filing fee on or before November 28, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee passed, and Appellants have not responded to this Court’s notice, paid the filing fee, or otherwise shown that they are excused from paying the fee. 1 Because Appellants failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. 2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered December 7, 2022. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. The case information sheet from the Smith County Clerk’s Office reflects that Appellants have not been declared indigent. 1 We also note that Appellants’ notice of appeal fails to comply with appellate Rule 9.5 and Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (service); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s record). 2 2 COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT DECEMBER 7, 2022 NO. 12-22-00297-CV CHERYL JACKSON AND JOHN HARMON, Appellants V. MEGAN JOHNSON, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 71235-A) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
