Michael Wainright d/b/a Wainright Construction v. David Delouche Appeal from County Court at Law of Cherokee County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-21-00198-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MICHAEL WAINRIGHT D/B/A WAINRIGHT CONSTRUCTION, APPELLANT V. DAVID DELOUCHE, APPELLEE § APPEAL FROM THE § COUNTY COURT AT LAW § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM On November 1, 2021, Michael Wainright d/b/a Wainright Construction filed a notice of appeal from a judgment signed on July 3, 2021. On November 3, this Court notified Wainright that his notice of appeal does not show the jurisdiction of this Court, i.e., there was no notice of appeal filed within the time allowed by the rules of appellate procedure and no timely motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. We informed Wainright that his appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before November 15 to show this Court’s jurisdiction. Wainright filed an amended notice of appeal, in which he states the judgment or order appealed from was signed on August 3, his motion for new trial was filed on September 1, and November 3 was the deadline to appeal. However, the record reflects that while the judgment was filed on August 3, it was signed on July 3. Under Rule 26.1, the notice of appeal must be filed within “30 days after the judgment is signed,” or in this case, August 2. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1 (emphasis added). The notice of appeal must be filed within ninety days “after the judgment is signed” if any party timely files a motion for new trial. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1) (emphasis added). To be timely, Wainright’s motion for new trial was due by August 2. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a) (motion for new trial must be filed “prior to or within thirty days after the judgment or other order 1 complained of is signed”) (emphasis added). Because he filed a motion for new trial on September 1, it was untimely and did not extend the appellate deadline for filing a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Thus, Wainright’s notice of appeal was due on or before August 2. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. But the notice of appeal was not filed until November 1, making it untimely. As this Court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as provided by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Opinion delivered November 17, 2021. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. 2 COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT NOVEMBER 17, 2021 NO. 12-21-00198-CV MICHAEL WAINRIGHT D/B/A WAINRIGHT CONSTRUCTION, Appellant V. DAVID DELOUCHE, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV09832) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
