In Re: James Skip Hulsey Appeal from 2nd District Court of Cherokee County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-21-00062-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: § JAMES SKIP HULSEY, § RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM James Skip Hulsey, an inmate acting pro se, filed this original proceeding to complain that Respondent, Cherokee County District Clerk Alison Dotson, failed to bring his notice of constitutional question to the trial court’s attention. 1 However, a district clerk is not a judge over which this Court has mandamus jurisdiction; nor does the record demonstrate that issuance of a writ of mandamus against Respondent is necessary to protect this Court’s jurisdiction. 2 See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 22.221(a), (b) (West Supp. 2020) (writ power); see also In re Eaton, No. 12–15–00118–CR, 2016 WL 6876502, at *1 (Tex. App.–Tyler, Nov. 22, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (appellate court lacked jurisdiction to consider merits of mandamus petition as to district clerk); In re Vargas, No. 01-12-00351-CV, 2012 WL 1454550, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 26, 2012, orig. proceeding) (mem. op) (per curiam) (dismissing mandamus proceeding against district clerk for want of jurisdiction because addressing complaint that clerk refused to 1 The State of Texas is the Real Party in Interest. For instance, we have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk for failure to forward to this Court a notice of appeal delivered to the clerk for filing because such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Talkington, No. 12-07-00272-CR, 2007 WL 2178551, at *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler July 31, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see Ex parte Sanders, No. WR-80,356-01, 2013 WL 5872901, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 30, 2013) (order, not designated for publication) (per curiam); see also In re Foster, No. 14-16-00698-CR, 2016 WL 5853282, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 6, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (per curiam); In re Smith, 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding). 2 file petition was not necessary to enforce appellate court jurisdiction). Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief under the circumstances of this case. We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered May 12, 2021. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (DO NOT PUBLISH) 2 COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT MAY 12, 2021 NO. 12-21-00062-CR JAMES SKIP HULSEY, Relator V. ALISON DOTSON, Respondent ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by James Skip Hulsey; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-21-00062-CR. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on April 22, 2021, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that it lacks jurisdiction, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
