In Re: Barbara Mott Bordelon Appeal from 159th District Court of Angelina County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-19-00092-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: § BARBARA MOTT BORDELON, § RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Barbara Mott Bordelon filed an original proceeding in which she challenged the denial of her motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. 1 On April 30, 2019, this Court conditionally granted Bordelon’s petition and directed Respondent to vacate his February 9, 2019, order denying Bordelon’s motion to dismiss, and in its stead, to issue an order granting Bordelon’s motion and dismissing Lois Hale’s lawsuit against Bordelon, without prejudice. By an order signed on May 1, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Bordelon’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Opinion delivered May 8, 2019. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) 1 Respondent is the Honorable Paul E. White, Judge of the 159th District Court in Angelina County, Texas. Lois Hale is the Real Party in Interest. COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT MAY 8, 2019 NO. 12-19-00092-CV BARBARA MOTT BORDELON, Relator V. HON. PAUL E. WHITE, Respondent ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Barbara Mott Bordelon; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-19-00092-CV and the defendant in trial court cause number CV-02421-13-06, pending on the docket of the 159th Judicial District Court of Angelina County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on March 12, 2019, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.