Tonja Augmon, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Obanelyvia Cunningham, Deceased v. Lydia Nanez Appeal from County Court of Smith County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-18-00029-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS TONJA AUGMON, INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF OBANELYVIA CUNNINGHAM, DECEASED, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE § COUNTY COURT OF § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS V. LYDIA NANEZ, APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Tonja Augmon, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Obanelyvia Cunningham, deceased filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. In her motion, Augmon states that the parties have reached a settlement agreement. The motion is signed by counsel for each party. Because Augmon has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), we grant the agreed motion, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Opinion delivered October 29, 2018. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OCTOBER 29, 2018 NO. 12-18-00029-CV TONJA AUGMON, INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF OBANELYVIA CUNNINGHAM, DECEASED, Appellant V. LYDIA NANEZ, Appellee Appeal from the County Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 42,220P) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the agreed motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that the motion to dismiss be granted. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed and that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, adjudged against the party that incurred them; for which execution may issue; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.