In the Interest of C.C. and Z.C., children Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Angelina County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-17-00114-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE INTEREST OF § APPEAL FROM THE C.C. AND Z.C., § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 CHILDREN § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION The trial court rendered a judgment terminating the parent-child relationship between B.C., C.C., and Z.C. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 161.001(b) (West Supp. 2017). We previously abated this appeal with instructions for the trial court to give proper notification pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and determine whether C.C. and Z.C. are Indian children as defined by the ICWA. See In re C.C. and Z.C., 12-17-00114-CV, 2017 WL 3184319, at *4 (Tex. App.—Tyler June 30, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). This proceeding is now reinstated. In the memorandum opinion and abatement order, we stated that if the trial court determined that C.C. and Z.C. are not Indian children, we will issue a judgment affirming the trial court’s termination judgment. On October 5, 2017, the Department’s attorney sent proper notice to the Secretary of the Interior, ICWA, and to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, stating that B.C. testified that the Indian tribe he could be affiliated with was named “Azteca.” According to the Department’s letter, that tribe is not federally recognized as eligible for services or, more particularly, is not an “Indian tribe” pursuant to the ICWA. See 25 U.S.C.A. § 1903(8) (Westlaw through L. No. 115-90). Moreover, B.C.’s mother stated that there were no active or registered tribal family members. Thus, on October 31, 2017, the trial court found that C.C. and Z.C. are not Indian children within the meaning of the ICWA. See 25 U.S.C.A. § 1903(4) (West current through P.L. 115-90); In re T.R., 491 S.W.3d 847, 852 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2016, no pet.) (stating that ICWA only applies to recognized tribes). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. BRIAN HOYLE Justice Opinion delivered February 6, 2018. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) 2 COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT FEBRUARY 6, 2018 NO. 12-17-00114-CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.C. AND Z.C., CHILDREN Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV-00638-15-10) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and brief filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. Brian Hoyle, Justice. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
