Christopher Cory Collins v. The State of Texas Appeal from County Court at Law of Nacogdoches County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-17-00126-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS CHRISTOPHER CORY COLLINS, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3. On April 20, 2017, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the notice of appeal failed to contain the information specifically required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1, i.e., the notice of appeal failed to possess counsel’s signature. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(a), (c). Appellant was informed that failure to file a proper notice of appeal on or before May 22, 2017, would result in referral to the Court for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3. The date for filing a proper notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.1, the appeal is dismissed. See id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(f). Opinion delivered May 31, 2017. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (DO NOT PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT MAY 31, 2017 NO. 12-17-00126-CR CHRISTOPHER CORY COLLINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CF1600254) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.