Jeffrey Andrew Munn v. Smith County Appraisal District Appeal from 241st District Court of Smith County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-17-00094-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JEFFREY ANDREW MUNN, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SMITH COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On April 4, 2017, this Court notified Appellant, Jeffrey Andrew Munn, that the information received in this appeal does not show the jurisdiction of this Court, i.e., there is no timely notice of appeal or timely motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3, 37.2. Munn was further notified that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before April 14, to show the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. This deadline has now passed, and Munn has neither shown the jurisdiction of this Court nor otherwise responded to its April 4 notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Opinion delivered April 19, 2017. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT APRIL 19, 2017 NO. 12-17-00094-CV JEFFREY ANDREW MUNN, Appellant V. SMITH COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee Appeal from the 241st District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 16-0142-C) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.