In the Matter of the Marriage of Edsel A. Dixon and Heather D. Dixon, and in the Interest of Ashley Lynn Dixon, a child Appeal from 354th District Court of Rains County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-15-00080-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF EDSEL A. DIXON AND HEATHER D. DIXON, AND IN THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY LYNN DIXON, A CHILD § APPEAL FROM THE 354TH § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT § RAINS COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). Appellant perfected his appeal on March 25, 2015, and the clerk’s record was filed on May 5, 2015. On June 24, 2015, the appeal was ordered submitted on the clerk’s record alone, making Appellant’s brief due on July 24, 2015. Appellant was notified on August 11, 2015, that his brief was due on July 24, 2015, and that neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time had been filed with the court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8. Additionally, Appellant was warned that the appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if a motion for extension of time was not filed on or before August 21, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was also notified that the motion must contain a reasonable explanation for his failure to file the brief and a showing that Appellee has not suffered material injury thereby. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). The August 21, 2015 deadline has passed, and Appellant has not complied with this court’s notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Opinion delivered February 29, 2016. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT FEBRUARY 29, 2016 NO. 12-15-00080-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF EDSEL A. DIXON AND HEATHER D. DIXON, AND IN THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY LYNN DIXON, A CHILD Appeal from the 354th District Court of Rains County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 9544) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
