In the Interest of M. M. and B. L., children Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Angelina County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-15-00234-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE INTEREST OF § APPEAL FROM THE M. M. AND B. L., § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 CHILDREN § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This accelerated appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). Appellant perfected her appeal on September 9, 2015, and her brief was originally due on October 12, 2015. On Appellant’s motion, the time for filing the brief was extended to November 2, 2015. When Appellant failed to file her brief by the due date, this Court notified Appellant on November 3, 2015, that the brief was past due. The notice warned that if the brief was not received by November 13, 2015, the appeal would be presented for dismissal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). To date, Appellant has neither complied with nor otherwise responded to this Court’s November 3, 2015 notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). Opinion delivered November 18, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT NOVEMBER 18, 2015 NO. 12-15-00234-CV IN THE INTEREST OF M. M. AND B. L., CHILDREN Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV-03-157-14-05) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.