In the Interest of B.B.D., C.C.D. and C.R.D., minor children Appeal from County Court at Law of Nacogdoches County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-15-00203-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE INTEREST OF § APPEAL FROM THE B.B.D., C.C.D. AND C.R.D., § COUNTY COURT AT LAW MINOR CHILDREN § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant has failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., August 11, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. Because Appellant did not file his docketing statement at that time, this court requested by letter dated August 11, 2015, that he file his docketing statement within ten days if he had not already done so. Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested. On August 26, 2015, the court notified Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed on or before September 8, 2015, unless he filed the required docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. The September 8 deadline has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered September 16, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 NO. 12-15-00203-CV IN THE INTEREST OF B.B.D., C.C.D. AND C.R.D., MINOR CHILDREN Appeal from the County Court at Law of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. C0824936) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
