In the Matter of the Marriage of Jerry Davidson Jr. and Dana M. NielAppeal from 159th District Court of Angelina County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-14-00066-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE § APPEAL FROM THE 159TH OF JERRY DAVIDSON, JR. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT AND DANA M. NIEL § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM On March 17, 2014, Appellant filed a notice of appeal complaining of the trial court s order evicting him from certain real property. On March 18, 2014, this court notified Appellant pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1, that the information received in this appeal does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order. Appellant was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or before March 28, 2014, to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline for amendment has passed, and Appellant has neither responded to the March 18, 2014 notice nor otherwise shown the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Opinion delivered March 31, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT MARCH 31, 2014 NO. 12-14-00066-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF JERRY DAVIDSON, JR. AND DANA M. NIEL Appeal from the 159th District Court of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. DV-01550-13-06) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
