In the Interest of N.H. and M.H., childrenAppeal from 420th District Court of Nacogdoches County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-14-00054-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE INTEREST OF § APPEAL FROM THE 420TH N.H. AND M.H., § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CHILDREN § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant has failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., February 13, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. Because Appellant did not file her docketing statement at that time, this court requested by letter dated February 19, 2014, that she file her docketing statement within ten days if she had not already done so. Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested. On March 7, 2014, the court notified Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed on or before March 17, 2014, unless she filed the required docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. The March 17 deadline has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the court s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered March 19, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT MARCH 19, 2014 NO. 12-14-00054-CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.H. AND M.H., CHILDREN Appeal from the 420th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. C1228572) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
