William Robert Parker v. Charles R. MitchellAppeal from 123rd District Court of Shelby County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-14-00009-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE 123RD V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CHARLES R. MITCHELL, APPELLEE § SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this pro se appeal. In his motion, Appellant states that there are still unresolved issues against other defendants. We interpret this as an assertion that the judgment he seeks to appeal is not a final judgment and therefore is not appealable. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because Appellant has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. Opinion delivered January 31, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT JANUARY 31, 2014 NO. 12-14-00009-CV WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER, Appellant V. CHARLES R. MITCHELL, Appellee Appeal from the 123rd District Court of Shelby County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 13-CV-32,350) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
