Jay Hartsell v. Donald Ray Parrish Appeal from 392nd District Court of Henderson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-13-00221-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JAY HARTSELL, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT DONALD RAY PARRISH, APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal in which they state that they have settled their dispute. After reviewing the motion, the court is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, Appellant and Appellee s joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). The costs of this appeal are taxed to the party incurring them. Opinion delivered September 24, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 NO. 12-13-00221-CV JAY HARTSELL, Appellant V. DONALD RAY PARRISH, Appellee Appeal from the 392nd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2012B-1006A) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the joint motion of the Appellant and the Appellee to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. The costs of the appeal are taxed to the party incurring them. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
