Marvin Waddleton, III v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 241st District Court of Smith County

Annotate this Case
lee, elmer edward v. state

NO. 12-06-00121-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MARVIN WADDLETON, III, APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

APPELLANT

V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault on a public servant, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for life. Thereafter, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court s full jurisdiction, the notice of appeal filed by an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court s certification of the appellant s right to appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The certification should be part of the record when notice is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or supplementation. Id. Appellant s notice of appeal does not include the required certification.

On April 28, 2006, this court notified Appellant through his counsel, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 25.2 and 37.1, that the notice of appeal does not include the trial court certification. The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless on or before May 30, 2006, the clerk s record was amended to include the required certification.

 

The deadline for responding to this court s notice has expired, and the clerk s record has not been amended to show Appellant s right to appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered June 7, 2006.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.